Meet Anuradha Bhasin, a Vocal Journalist Facing Government Crackdown
Quratulain Rehbar
Officials from the Jammu and Kashmir administration on Monday sealed the Srinagar office of the Kashmir Times, a prominent English daily in J&K. Located in the Press Enclave, where most newspapers offices are located in government-owned apartment buildings, an office was allotted to Kashmir Times during the region’s most turbulent times – the 1990s.
Soon after the office was sealed, Anuradha Bhasin, the newspaper’s executive editor who lives in Jammu, alleged that no prior notice was sent to her. The decision was “vendetta” by the government “for speaking out” and for her journalistic work, which has been widely lauded.
A few days ago, The Wire spoke to Anuradha, who alleged that there is a “pattern” in these “attacks”. The clampdown intensified, she argued, after she took a critical stance on Central government policies and spoke for press freedom of Kashmir after the dilution of Article 370.
Earlier, on October 4, Anuradha had alleged assault by the brother of a former National Conference legislator. According to her, a few people barged into her government-allotted apartment in Jammu and ransacked it. Bhasin alleged that the “goons were acting in connivance with the (government) estates department and some police personnel”.
Since the dilution of Article 370 in August 2019, Anuradha Bhasin has become a rare vocal voice about press freedom in Kashmir, the communication gag and human rights abuses.
Early life
In her school days, Bhasin was interested in writing short stories and poems, which would also get published in the Kashmir Times’ children’s column. The newspaper was headed by her father, Ved Bhasin, who was a political activist and one of the most prominent journalists from Jammu and Kashmir.
Ved started Kashmir Times in 1955 and nourished it for more than 60 years. Now, the newspaper is one of the oldest english dailies in J&K.
When Anuradha started showing interest in journalism as a teenager, her father both encouraged her and told her to stay away from the profession. “Having gone through various struggles, my father was protective and didn’t want me to join the profession,” she told The Wire.
Ved offered a space for young writers in his newspaper, which encouraged her to write and grew her interest in journalism growing.
In 1989, Anuradha formally joined the Kashmir Times as a trainee reporter, while she was also enrolled in a law course in Delhi University. She wasn’t able to complete her course, however, because her mother suddenly got sick.
The timing coincided with a turbulent period in Jammu and Kashmir. There were widespread allegations of rigging in that year’s state elections. A joint front of different separatist political parties had come together under a single banner, Muslim United Front (MUF), and decided to fight the elections. With Farooq Abdullah coming to power, most MUF leaders took on an anti-India stand. Militancy erupted in Kashmir and leaders from the MUF were leading from the front.
Kashmir descended into violent armed conflict. At the same time, India’s northern state of Punjab, which has close proximity to Jammu, was also witnessing bloodshed after the government clamped down on separatist militants from the Khalistan movement.
“As I started working, I got caught in the two conflicts. I gave up my studies for journalism. It was the time when I got curious to know about things around me,” said Anuradha.
Her father’s legacy
Anuradha remembers when her classmates in school would talk about religion and God. These were the words she had not heard at her home from her parents. “There was no particular religion my parents would follow,” she said.
Once, after she repeatedly heard her classmates talking about religion, she went to ask her father about it. “I named several Gods and asked him which one he believed in,” she said “He told me, ‘I believe in you’.”
She was taken aback by the answer, and wasn’t sure what he meant. But gradually, she said, the meaning dawned on her. “He had faith in the creation, he believed in humans and humanity.”
This lesson is what Anuradha has lived her life by, she said. “Having faith in human beings is important. Have that faith. We must live up to the faith of another human in us.”
Her courage, Anuradha said, comes from seeing her father take stands, even when he was targeted for his courageous journalism. She has several memories of her father, Ved, from when he stood tall for writing the truth and was unrelenting. One memory she has is from 1983, when she was a school student. Her father was attacked by a Hindu right-wing group. “Almost 200 men barged into his office. They attacked him with batons and sharp-edged weapons,” she recalled.
Ved Bhasin survived the assault and many newspapers wrote solidarity pieces for him. This made Anuradha understand that her father wasn’t just an ordinary person, but someone whose values and beliefs made some groups want to silence him.
The cost of journalism
Curiosity and the quest for writing the truth, Bhasin says, has made her keep doing her job. She believes, though, that there are many who have been worse impacted than her. “There is a generation of people who live through fear, and it doesn’t matter to them, and I have not gone through it the same way. They have been impacted more even though there are still huge costs to speak out or write,” she said.
In the past, Kashmir Times has been targeted by both the government and militant groups. Several militant groups banned the newspaper’s circulation for a few days in 1989. Anuradha, during this time, saw attacks on hawkers and everyday campaigns to stop the circulation of the newspaper.
In 1992, Bhasin said, the paper was banned by a fringe Shiv Sena group and hawkers were attacked. “My colleagues were intimidated as well.”
Now, the physical threats might have reduced, Bhasin said, but “the government has a more sophisticated ways to attack and silence us”.
In 2010, government advertisements in the newspaper were stopped, which continues till this date.
Bhasin believes that this has affected the quality of journalism in her newspaper. “It also meant cutting costs on our staff. We weren’t able to bring in many voices,” she said.
After August 5
After Article 370 was read down, the government imposed a complete communication blackout on the people of J&K. Anuradha filed a petition in the Supreme Court and argued that the “government should reconsider its decision”.
She said the restrictions were passed on the belief that there would be “a danger to law and order. However, public order is not the same as law and order and neither was at risk when the order was passed.”
At that time, local publications had come to halt because of the communications blackout. The government had silenced the entire local media except a few independent organisations, which would barely write about the human rights violation.
Anuradha was grappling with several questions, like who she should talk to to understand the situation on the ground. She tried hard to get in touch with her reporters, but it proved impossible.
“There were many things going on in my mind, like how could I carry the information and disseminate it. I felt that I didn’t know anything, and this is my profession, to know,” she said.
That’s when she decided to legally challenge the government’s decision. “Before this, there were unrests like in 2008, 2010 and 2016 but a complete blackout never happened before,” she said.
Difficult to speak out
Since last year, journalists in Kashmir have been increasingly intimidated and even charged under draconian laws, which has pushed the local media to self-censorship .
“The sense of intimidation among Kashmiri journalists is more than I am facing. It is difficult for them to speak more openly,” she says, adding “either we have to fight back or surrender”.
Bhasin told The Wire that she is worried about the future of the local media if the current state of affairs continues.
“There are minimal attempts to speak truth. Criticism of the government has disappeared in the editorials,” she said. “Except a few independent newspapers which give space to important things, larger stories from Kashmir are missing.”
“The Kashmir press was growing vibrantly,” she said, adding, “There is huge talent in people. I don’t do a fair job either but it’s challenging and we need to fight unitedly.”
(Article courtesy: The Wire.)
❈ ❈ ❈
Stop Harassment of Anuradha Bhasin and Other Independent Voices in Kashmir: NWMI
Sabrangindia
The Network of Women in Media, India, (NWMI) has strongly condemned the continued targeting and harassment of Anuradha Bhasin, editor of Kashmir Times, one of the oldest English daily newspapers published in Jammu & Kashmir. “We stand in solidarity with her at this difficult time,” the NWMI, representing media women from across the country issued a statement of solidarity with Bhasin, after the Srinagar office of Kashmir Times newspaper was sealed by the Estate Department of the Jammu & Kashmir administration on Monday, October 19. As reported earlier the building of Kashmir Times is located in the city’s Press Enclave area, along with many other media houses, all of whom have been allotted spaces here for decames. The Kashmir Times has had its office here since the early 1990s.
Editor Anuradha Bhasin has described the action as “vendetta for speaking out” on her social media post, after the second official address allotted to her was ‘raided’ and ‘sealed’ by the Estates Department. She had stated on her social media that the office was locked up “without any due process of cancellation and eviction, same way as I was evicted from a flat in Jammu, where my belongings including valuables were handed over to “new allottee”. Vendetta for speaking out! No due process followed. How peevish!”
The NWMI cited an Bhasin’s words that while the government has the right to evict an allottee, there are certain criteria and they have to follow due process. The Network has stated that “Bhasin has been critical of the Government of India’s tough policies in Kashmir, including the curbs on communication and muzzling of the press since August 2019, when two special laws pertaining to Jammu & Kashmir, Articles 370 and 35 A, were unilaterally revoked. As a journalist, she has been very vocal about several policies and actions of the central government, both in Kashmir and across India.”
Bhasin had also filed a petition in the Supreme Court last year demanding the restoration of modes of communication and the initiation of necessary steps for ensuring the free and safe movement of journalists and media personnel in the region. In response to the petition the Supreme Court had in January 2020 directed the administration in Jammu & Kashmir to review the curbs on communication every week and ensure free speech.
According to NWMI, “It is important to note that in the wake of her petition Kashmir Times stopped receiving advertisements and has been experiencing severe financial strain.
Bhasin has spoken out strongly against the new Media Policy of the Jammu & Kashmir administration, announced in June 2020, pointing out that “it straitjackets the local media. The attack on Kashmir Times is yet another example of how the administration seeks to punish independent media while favouring pliant media.”
The statement added that “the deliberate targeting of Bhasin and other journalists in Kashmir through different means reveal the continuing intimidation of journalists in the erstwhile state (demoted to a union territory last year), who have been reporting under extremely difficult circumstances, despite severe restrictions on access to the Internet. This is totally unacceptable and condemnable.”
The NWMI has demanded that the authorities “stop harassing and thereby attempting to silence critical voices. Journalists, including Anuradha Bhasin, must be allowed to work freely, without being intimidated or under the constant threat of being summoned or booked under stringent laws that leave little room for the pursuit of justice.” The Network has also demanded that “the office of Kashmir Times be restored to the organisation and that the personal belongings of Anuradha Bhasin that were not handed over to her when she was unceremoniously evicted from the residential premises she was lawfully using be returned to her.”
Scores of journalists from across the country have stood up in solidarity with Bhasin, who had earlier told SabrangIndia that she will take legal recourse to address this.
The Delhi Union of Journalists has also condemned the actions of the government which it states are “clearly aimed at stifling the free press.” The DUJ stated that this “comes on the heels of the arbitrary eviction of the Kashmir Times Editor Anuradha Bhasin from her residence. We note that Kashmir Times journalists were not permitted to take out their computers and other professional equipment before the eviction. Editor Bhasin has said that the eviction happened without due legal process and she will challenge it in court.
The DUJ notes “with alarm the growing intimidation of the media across the country through various means” and has condemned “among others the violent attack on veteran journalist Kamal Shukla in Chhattisgarh on September 26, 2020 and the arrest of Ramesh Rath of Odisha Television on October 15,2020.” It added that it was “dismayed at the increasing political nature of such actions and the impunity enjoyed by those who instigate, order or commit attacks.”
