J&K Could Have Been a Model of Development for Rest of India

Sandeep Pandey, Rajendran Narayanan

 

After being detained illegally at their respective residences for six months now, the Public Safety Act has been invoked against Omar Abdullah, Mehbooba Mufti and even Shah Faesal, in order to continue their detention. Omar Abdullah has been accused for his capacity to influence people to the extent that they came out to vote in large numbers even during the peak of militancy despite poll boycott calls by militants, which has been so far considered an asset from the Government of India’s perspective. The ability of the Bhartiya Janata Party government to turn an argument on its head is assuming ludicrous dimension. A politician is considered successful only if s(he) can influence voters. Narendra Modi would be considered the most guilty today if this were a criterion to judge a politician’s nuisance value. Mehbooba Mufti has been described as a scheming person known for dangerous and insidious machinations and usurping nature. She has also been accused of making provocative statements that lead to incitement of violence and having invoked religion to create a divide. Most BJP and RSS leaders would be guilty of exactly the same charges as success of their politics is based on spreading hated towards Muslims and encouraging violence against Muslims, Dalits and anybody who is critical of their ideology.

 

Earlier, when Dr. Farooq Abdullah, Omar and Mehbooba were detained in August, the reason given by Amit Shah was that the two families have looted Jammu and Kashmir, as if there had been no other corrupt Chief Ministers in the country. Several former Chief Ministers have gone to jail in the past and some are presently in jail for indulging in corruption. At least no corruption charges have been brought against the abovementioned two J&K families yet, let alone having proved them. Omar Abdullah has seved as a union minister of state in the Atal Behari Vajpayee government and Bhartiya Janata Party was in alliance till not very long ago with Mehbooba Mufti’s party. How have these J&K leaders suddenly become pariahs?

 

If the J&K leaders were the villains that the government would now like us to believe, then we should expect a sorry state of affairs from the point of view of governance in J&K. During the protests after abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A related to J&K, famous economist Jean Dreze was seen standing at Jantar Mantar with a placard which pointed out that some of the human development indices of J&K are even better than those of Gujarat. The sordid state of homelessness, slum dwelling and inhuman living conditions that rest of India has become immune to, is visibly absent in J&K. Land reforms was initiated by Sheikh Abdullah, the first executive head of J&K after its accession to India, to ensure that every family had a minimum of 12.5 acres of land. The basic necessities of food, clothing and housing are taken care of in J&K. Nobody lives in kuchcha houses or slums. There are no starvation deaths in J&K, neither do farmers commit suicide. In the J&K Bank, the government stood as guarantor. The daily wage rate is among the highest in India, so much so that J&K was known as Dubai of India.

 

According to data from last decade, the poverty rate in J&K of 9.4% was the lowest among all Indian states. The proportion of population falling in India’s lowest wealth quintile at 1.2% was the least after Kerala, which had only 1% population in this category. Life expectancy for males at 69.2 years was second best after Kerala and for females at 71.1 years was fifth best after Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra and Punjab. At 68.1%, the female population aged 15–19 years who had completed 8 years of schooling is behind only four states—Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra. At 85.7% female and 89.7% male children aged 6–14 years who were then enrolled in school, J&K was only behind Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Uttarakhand. Estimated ratio of female to male death rate in age group 1–4 years of 0.58 was the least in the country. At 25.6%, J&K was the second best in the country after Kerala in terms of proportion of children below the age of 5 years who are undernourished on the criterion of weight for age. Proportion of children aged 12–23 months who are fully immunised in J&K, at 66.7%, ranks fourth in the country. In proportion of villages with government health facility, J&K with 62.2% was behind only Kerala and Odisha. In proportion of households with electricity, J&K with 93.2% households was behind only Himachal Pradesh and Punjab. In proportion of households with toilets J&K is within the top eleven states. The rural male average daily wage rate for casual labourers aged 15–59 years is second highest in the country after Kerala and the corresponding female wage rate is the highest in the country. The urban area male wage rate for J&K is fifth highest and the corresponding female wage rate is second highest in the country. After Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, J&K has the least suicide rate in the country.

 

Considering that J&K has been a troubled state with no stable and strong government with widespread people’s support, the sitution regarding human development indices, general well being of people and physical infrastructure compares quite favourably with some of the best states in India. Obviously this did not happen in vacuum. The leaders of the state must have pursued pro-people policies which have maintained J&K’s position among the most well doing states. This exposes the lie propagated by BJP leaders led by the Prime Minister and Home Minister themselves that J&K was a backward state, and its so called integration with India by the decisions taken on 5th August, 2019 will open new opportunities for its development. The fact of the matter is that the rest of India needs to learn from J&K how it has implemented land reforms and how it has been able to tackle poverty.

 

[Sandeep is with Socialist Party (India) and Rajendran teaches at Azmi Premji Univeristy. The data used in the article is taken from the book ‘An Uncertain Glory: India and its Contradictions’ by Jean Dreze and Amartya Sen.]

Janata Weekly does not necessarily adhere to all of the views conveyed in articles republished by it. Our goal is to share a variety of democratic socialist perspectives that we think our readers will find interesting or useful. —Eds.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email
Telegram

Contribute for Janata Weekly

Also Read In This Issue:

Muslims and 2024 Lok Sabha Elections – 2 Articles

‘How Did the Muslim Vote?’: Despite being the target of the Prime Minister’s public speeches and facing continuous discrimination, the Muslim voter has voted in support of saving the Constitution and India’s democracy. Also: ‘‘A Little Less Suffocating: Why Many Muslims View the Lok Sabha Verdict with Cautious Hope”.

Read More »

If you are enjoying reading Janata Weekly, DO FORWARD THE WEEKLY MAIL to your mailing list(s) and invite people for free subscription of magazine.

Subscribe to Janata Weekly Newsletter & WhatsApp Channel

Help us increase our readership.
If you are enjoying reading Janata Weekly, DO FORWARD THE WEEKLY MAIL to your mailing list and invite people to subscribe for FREE!