Ecuador Heads to Presidential Runoff with Opposing Visions on the Ballot

Marc Becker

Ecuador is headed to a runoff election between two candidates who promise very different visions for the future of the country.

Of the eight candidates competing in the August 20 election, Luisa González of former leftist president Rafael Correa’s Revolución Ciudadana (Citizen’s Revolution) party came out on top. But she will have to face off against right-wing business owner Daniel Noboa in a second round on October 15.

González received 33 percent of the vote—about where pre-election polls had placed her. Noboa, however, won a surprising 24 percent, significantly outperforming expectations that he would not make it to the second round. To have won outright, González would either have needed to reach 50 percent of the vote, or 40 percent with a 10-point lead over the closest competitor.

Like Correa, González is a progressive Keynesian on economic issues, but conservative on social ones. In particular, she is strongly opposed to abortion rights. If elected, González promises to use $2.5 billion from international reserves to shore up the struggling economy and bring back Correa’s social programs that led to plunging rates of poverty and inequality.

Noboa is the son of the conservative and wealthy banana tycoon Álvaro Noboa, who in past decades launched five failed campaigns for the presidency. If elected, Noboa would represent a continuation and perhaps intensification of current conservative president Guillermo Lasso’s neoliberal economic policies—the same ones that Lasso failed to implement in his two years in office and that ultimately led to his ouster.

Noboa’s running mate Verónica Abad is a conservative anti-abortion activist from Cuenca who is a strong supporter of Trump and Bolsonaro. She has appeared on social media wearing a Trump “Make American Great Again” (MAGA) hat

While Correa and his Revolución Ciudadana—and thus by extension González—enjoy the highest levels of popular support in the country, their negatives also make it the hardest for her to win the presidency.

On the campaign trail in 2006 and then in office for 10 years as president, Correa famously tangled badly with Ecuador’s powerful social movements and others to his left. In the 2021 elections, Lasso leveraged this opposition to go from less than 20 percent of the vote in the first round to defeating Revolución Ciudadana’s candidate Andrés Arauz in the second.

Arauz is now running for vice president with González on the Revolución Ciudadana ticket.

The biggest losers in the August 20 race were the Indigenous environmentalist Yaku Pérez and the Indigenous-aligned Pachakutik political movement. Unlike in the 2021 presidential race, this time Pérez did not enjoy the formal backing of Pachakutik or its social movement wing CONAIE.

Pérez scored strong support in the 2021 race—barely missing a second-place finish that would have placed him in the second and definitive round against Arauz. This time, pre-election polling had given him a very viable chance of making the second round, but he ultimately polled less than 4 percent of the vote.

Likewise, Pachakutik surpassed expectations in February’s local elections and became the second or third most potent political force in the country. This time it hardly registered in the congressional races, in which Revolución Ciudadana led voter preferences.

The election comes after the deeply unpopular Lasso dissolved the National Assembly on May 17, triggering early presidential and congressional elections.

Facing certain impeachment over his mishandling of the country’s affairs, Lasso invoked an innovative provision in the 2008 Constitution known as “muerte cruzada” or “mutually assured death” that allows the president to dissolve parliament and rule by decree for six months until new presidential and legislative elections are held.

The winner of the October 15 contest will take office on October 26 and serve the remaining 17 months of Lasso’s mandate. The next regularly scheduled elections in 2025 will select a new president.

The Assassination of Fernando Villavicencio

The presidential race was shaken up on the evening of August 9, only 10 days before Ecuadorians went to the polls, when the candidate Fernando Villavicencio was cut down in a hail of bullets as he exited a campaign event at the Colegio Anderson in the northern part of Quito.

Questions and conspiracies immediately spun around Villavicencio’s assassination, including why he did not have better security protection, who might have ordered the hit, and who would most benefit from his elimination from the race.

Video shows police officers kicking the alleged assassin and dragging him to a police station, rather than a hospital, where he died unattended from his wounds. Two other alleged assailants escaped on a motorcycle. The police quickly arrested six individuals—all Colombians—who they charged as responsible for the murder.

Some conservative pundits immediately pointed the finger at former president Correa, of whom Villavicencio was an ardent critic. But running in the middle of the eight-candidate pack, Villavicencio presented little threat to González, the race’s frontrunner. With conservative opposition to González fragmented between seven rival candidates, Villavicencio was unlikely to advance to the second round.

Instead, Villavicencio’s assassination triggered an outpouring of sympathy for his campaign and granted Christian Zurita, a journalist who stood in for him on the ballot, a level of support that he would not otherwise have enjoyed. Although not enough to push Zurita into the second round, the ticket came in third place with about 16 percent of the vote.

Meanwhile, congressional candidates with Villavicencio’s Movimiento Construye polled much better than expected, making the party the second strongest force (after Revolución Ciudadana) in the new National Assembly.

Villavicencio’s assassination also played into the law-and-order narrative of other conservative candidates that otherwise had trouble gaining traction in the campaign. In particular, it benefited Jan Topic, who presents himself as an Ecuadorian version of El Salvador’s authoritarian president Nayib Bukele. Topic, who had been languishing in the polls, exploited the assassination to increase his calls for hardline mano dura (iron fist) policies against drug smugglers. He came in fourth place with 15 percent—just barely behind Villavicencio/Zurita.

For decades, nestled between Colombia and Peru and their problems of civils wars and drug trafficking, Ecuador had been a relatively peaceful island. Although political assassinations—including of presidential candidates—were all too common in Colombia, they were exceedingly rare in Ecuador.

While it can be difficult to distinguish between political acts and common crime, it appears that in recent months politically motivated attacks have been on the rise. On July 23, the mayor of the port city of Manta, Agustín Intriago, was shot dead while inspecting a public works project. Days earlier, Rider Sánchez, a congressional candidate for the coastal province of Esmeraldas, was also murdered. On August 14, less than a week after Villavicencio’s assassination, Pedro Briones, a local leader of Revolución Ciudadana in Esmeraldas, was also shot and killed.

In February’s local elections, assassins murdered the mayoral candidate Omar Menéndez in the city of Puerto López just hours before polls opened. (He won the race anyway.) Two weeks earlier, the candidate for mayor of Salinas, Julio César Farachio, was also shot dead.

In the aftermath of Villavicencio’s assassination, other presidential and congressional candidates claimed to be targets of attacks, although it remained unclear whether those were politically motivated.

Crime and Insecurity

Ecuador has recently faced a surge in drug trafficking and violent crime, which is a significant reversal from when Correa was president. By the time he left office in 2017, Ecuador’s homicide rate had dropped to a historic low of just 5.84 per 100,000 people, among the lowest in Latin America. By 2022, that rate had more than quadrupled to 26.1 per 100,000.

A new report from the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) finds that the return to International Monetary Fund (IMF) dictates during the administrations of Lasso and his predecessor, Lenín Moreno, reversed the significant gains that Correa had made during his 10 years in office. As a result of slashed social spending, poverty and economic inequality as well as crime and insecurity have increased, and health outcomes have worsened.

Ecuador now has the fourth highest homicide rate in Latin America—behind only Venezuela, Honduras, and Colombia. Prisons have become particularly dangerous, with at least 400 inmates killed in prison riots since 2021.

Multiple factors and explanations account for turning Ecuador from one of the safest to one of the most dangerous countries in the Americas.

As causations for the increase in insecurity, many pundits point to factors such as the 2016 peace accords with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) that loosened control over drug trafficking routes, as well the Covid-19 pandemic that disrupted the fabric of Ecuadorian society.

Ecuador is no stranger to the drug trade, but not in terms of production or trafficking. For decades, some analysts have pointed to Quito’s booming financial sector as partially due to the laundering of profits from the drug trade.

According to Colombian president Gustavo Petro, the current increase in drug trafficking in Ecuador is because of the collapse of the U.S. cocaine market, which has been replaced with the much more deadly fentanyl boom. As a result, trafficking routes that previously took cocaine from Colombia northward through Central America, the Caribbean, and Mexico to the United States, have now turned southward.

Petro said that most cocaine production has shifted to a 10-kilometer strip in Colombia along the country’s western border with Ecuador. From there, the cocaine is shipped eastward through Ecuador to Asia and Australia.

It appears that the incendiary gang battles that Ecuador is currently suffering is for control over these new and highly lucrative drug trafficking routes.

Against this backdrop, some quickly assumed that a drug trafficking organization that Villavicencio had stridently criticized had ordered the hit. In a video, heavily armed figures with balaclava-covered faces immediately claimed responsibility on behalf of one such group, Los Lobos. But then a second video appeared claiming to be from the “real” Los Lobos. With their faces plainly visible, they denied culpability. They accused Los Choneros, a competing drug trafficking organization, of attempting to frame them for the murder.

In February 2021, Los Lobos broke from Los Choneros, which at the time was the largest and most violent of the criminal bands in Ecuador, after the killing of Jorge Luis Zambrano, alias “Rasquiña” or “JL,” the leader of Los Choneros. A rupture of an alliance between Los Lobos and another group known as Tiguerones on July 25 of this year led to a prison massacre.

On August 12, authorities moved Adolfo Macías, alias “Fito,” the leader of Los Choneros, from a low-security to a maximum-security prison in Guayaquil. The government mobilized 4,000 soldiers and police officers for the transfer. They raided the jail where he had been held and seized weapons, ammunition, and explosives. Days before his assassination, Villavicencio had accused Macías of threatening him and his campaign team.

These competing charges and claims of responsibility raise the possibility that the assassination had nothing to do with the electoral campaign or of removing someone who was critical of their operations, but rather to sully the name of a competing organization or to gain a certain level of street cred among their followers.

Ironically, among those who have the most to lose from Villavicencio’s assassination and subsequent calls for a Bukele-style administration in Ecuador are the gangs that allegedly ordered the hit. Sometimes an action which appears completely logical and rational on one level is absolutely the wrong thing to do on another.

Landmark Victory for Yasuní

Also on the August 20 ballot were two environmental measures that received strong support.

The first was a referendum to halt drilling at the Ishpingo-Tambococha-Tiputini (ITT) oilfield, also known as oil block 43, which lies in the ecologically sensitive Yasuní National Park.

Located in the eastern Amazon, Yasuní is one of the world’s richest pockets of biodiversity. It is also home to the Waorani nation and the Tagaeri and Taromenane, the last remaining Indigenous communities in the country who have chosen to live in voluntary isolation.

For 10 years, the activist movement Yasunidos sought to bring this referendum to a vote. In a six-month period a decade ago, 1,400 volunteers collected more than 757,000 signatures, almost 200,000 more than required to trigger a ballot measure. After lengthy legal battles, Ecuador’s highest court finally ruled in May that the vote could take place. The state oil company Petroecuador will now have a year and a half to wind down operations. Opponents claim that Ecuador will lose billions of dollars in revenue due to this decision.

Residents of the Metropolitan District of Quito also voted overwhelmingly to ban metallic mining in the Chocó Andino, a vast area of land near the capital.

Curiously, the passage of both measures did not translate into electoral support for Yaku Pérez’s Indigenous environmentalist candidacy. Apparently, Villavicencio’s assassination changed political narratives to the point where Pérez’s promises of a so-called “third way” that was neither Correa nor Lasso no longer had much resonance among the voters.

In 2021, the political force that Pérez represented boycotted the second round of the election instead of supporting the candidacy of Revolución Ciudadana’s Arauz. In effect, the boycott gave the election to Lasso. This time, neither Pérez nor Pachakutik are positioned to play kingmaker.

An open question now is whether the Trump- or Bolsonaro-style rightwing law-and-order populism that fourth-place-finisher Topic represents will rally behind the traditional oligarchy that Noboa embodies. If so, that will likely give Noboa the margin necessary to defeat González—as happened with Lasso in 2021—and move forward with a neoliberal agenda.

Alternatively, González promises to return Ecuador to the glory days of Correa’s decade in power. To achieve that she will need to thread the tricky needle of drawing on the strong support that the former president still enjoys while also bringing in those who he has alienated to the point that they have promised never to support him.

(Marc Becker is the author among other works of ‘Indians and Leftists in the Making of Ecuador’s Modern Indigenous Movements’ (2008) and ‘Pachakutik: Indigenous movements and electoral politics in Ecuador’ (2011). Courtesy: The North American Congress on Latin America (NACLA), an independent, nonprofit organization founded in 1966 to examine and critique U.S. imperialism and political, economic, and military intervention in the Western hemisphere.)

❈ ❈ ❈

Ecuador: National Referendum Ending Oil Exploitation in the Amazon Is Victorious

Santiago Rosero

While most of the focus was on the general elections in Ecuador, a national referendum was held on oil exploitation in the Amazon. In addition, in a regional referendum, the inhabitants of Quito voted on mining. In both cases, the vote to stop exploitation triumphed.

The long struggle to save Yasuní Biosphere Reserve reached a milestone this Sunday when the majority of the Ecuadorian population voted in favor of keeping the existing oil in Block 43 in the ground. This also includes the Ishpingo, Tambococha, and Tiputini fields. The yes vote was 59%, while the no vote to continue exploitation was 41%. The referendum was held in the context of the presidential and legislative elections where the correaist got 33% and the Guayaquil businessman Daniel Noboa 24% advancing them both to the second round to be held on October 15.

The oil block 43 is partially located within the Yasuní National Park (Ecuadorian Amazon), one of the areas with the greatest biodiversity on the planet and which, together with the neighboring Huaorani Ancestral Territory, was declared a biosphere reserve by UNESCO in 1989. It is also home to the Tagaeri and Taromenane, the last peoples in voluntary isolation in Ecuador.

After the failure in 2013 of the Yasuní Initiative presented by the government of then President Rafael Correa, it was announced that the block would be exploited. It was then that the environmental group Yasunidos was formed, which immediately submitted a question to the Constitutional Court to call for a referendum and for the Ecuadorian people to decide on this issue:

Do you agree that the Ecuadorian government should keep the crude oil, known as Block 43, indefinitely in the subsoil?

Bogged down in a process that would later be recognized as fraudulent, neither the question nor the consultation were approved at that time, so Yasunidos began a tortuous legal battle that would take 10 years and cross three governments. Along the way, that is, starting in 2016, the Block 43 began to be exploited after the declaration of national interest that former President Correa had requested to the National Assembly in 2013 came into force. After the official proclamation of the results this Sunday, the operations must now stop and, according to the law, the state-owned Petroecuador will have one year to dismantle its facilities and leave that area of Yasuní. However, Petroecuador officials have indicated that the withdrawal would take at least five years since there are around 230 wells in operation there.

“This is something historic. Ecuador has taken the first concrete step to fight climate change and has set a global example,” says Antonella Calle, spokesperson for Yasunidos. “That is very important because it forces countries around the world to make real decisions in this regard. On the other hand, this shows us once again that the Ecuadorian people are in favor of defending life, nature, the rights of people and animals.”

Opposing figures and campaigns

The Government of Guillermo Lasso has sustained the argument of the supposed economic loss that the State would incur by ceasing to exploit block 43: 1200 million dollars per year, considering that, according to his figures, that was the income achieved in 2022. Petroecuador’s manager, Ramón Correa, has also pointed out that in 20 years, the loss would total US$ 16.47 billion, which includes US$ 13.8 billion for oil revenues not received; US$ 467 million for the cost of abandoning the block; US$ 1.952 billion for the infrastructure and facilities that will have to be removed, and US$ 251 million for social compensations.

Carlos Larrea, economist, and member of Yasunidos has pointed out that this calculation is inaccurate since it is the result of multiplying 55,000 barrels of oil that Block 43 supposedly produces per day (about 12% of the country’s total production), 60 dollars per barrel and 365 days of the year. In this way, 1.2 billion is achieved, but in exports, not in income for the State. Larrea argues that the price of $60 per barrel is unrealistic since 2016 when exploitation of that block began, the price has been $51. Moreover, the calculation does not consider the cost of extraction, which is $35 per barrel, and the fact that it is a crude that contains too much water (11 barrels of water for each barrel of oil), which reduces its quality and makes it difficult to extract. The Minister of Energy himself, Fernando Santos, had said about this oil that “it was a disappointment,” that it is a “very heavy tar,” and that the enormous amount of water it contains “finds a way out to the surface and drowns the well”.

Countering the eventual losses pointed out by the Lasso government, Yasunidos has mentioned some alternatives, among them to eliminate the tax exemptions granted by the State to the richest groups in the country. According to information from the Internal Revenue Service (SRI), in 2021, Ecuador stopped receiving 6,338 million dollars for this reason, which in only one year is 30% more than what it would receive for exploiting the ITT block for 33 years.

While the Government’s strategy was to replicate the figures of the alleged losses through various spokespeople and with the main information media at its disposal, the campaign for a “yes” vote concentrated on the defense of natural resources, biodiversity, the territory of plants, animals and Amazonian peoples, with emphasis on the fact that this is not only Ecuador’s heritage but that of the world.

Rich in audiovisual products and very active in social networks, the Yes campaign stood out for its vitality and multiple voices. Although it radiated a mostly youthful energy, it was also careful to generate messages targeted to specific sectors, including academia, coastal populations, and indigenous peoples and nationalities.

“The beauty of this campaign is that it was megadiverse; like Yasuní,” says Antonella Calle. “Many wills from different parts of Ecuador and the world have joined in; various sectors of society, not only environmentalists. It has been a struggle from the heart, activism and the hope of defending life.”

Among the foreign personalities who backed the yes vote were activist Greta Thunberg and actors Leonardo DiCaprio, Mark Ruffalo, Jason Momoa, and Gael García Bernal. “Ecuador could become an example of democratizing climate policy, offering people the opportunity to vote for the forest, indigenous rights, the climate and the well-being of the planet,” DiCaprio wrote on his social networks.

With the outcome of the referendum now comes the phasing out of the ITT oil facilities. “We are going to make sure that the oil tankers leave our sacred forest as soon as possible,” says Nemonte Nenquimo, an indigenous leader, member of the Huaorani nationality, and winner of the Goldman 2020 environmental award.

“And we are going to share this model of direct action on climate change with all peoples and countries, because at this time of climate crisis the world needs models of struggle that put power in the hands of the people.”

Another yes to stop mining

Parallel to the Yasuní consultation, the inhabitants of the Metropolitan District of Quito voted in a referendum on mining in six of its rural parishes in the northwest, which make up the Chocó Andino commonwealth, a territory of 287,000 hectares also declared a biosphere reserve by UNESCO. This is another area with very rich biodiversity, where 270 species of mammals, 210 reptiles, 130 amphibians, and 227 varieties of orchids have been recorded.

In this case, the will to stop the advance of mining obtained 68% of the votes. “This triumph has the weight of what the people want and need, because we citizens must be the ones to build democracy,” says Inti Arcos, spokesperson for the Quito Without Mining collective, which promoted the consultation.

“It is the expression that we want a different world and that it is possible for economic alternatives to emerge that respect human rights and the rights of nature. As a society we have entered a fatal circle of violence, and mining was going to bring us more violence, because violence means entering the territories and destroying nature and the lives of the people.”

In the Andean Chocó, there are already twelve copper, gold, and silver mining concessions of artisanal, small, medium, and large scale in early stages of exploration. The yes vote in this consultation will prohibit mining at these four scales and the granting of new concessions, but existing projects will remain active.

(Courtesy: Resumen Latinoamericano – English. Resumen is a newsletter whose focus is news and analysis coming primarily from Latin America by writers, researchers, and activists living there.)